Monday, September 28, 2009

Welcome to the Jungle: Pre-Columbian Amazonia


This semester, I am taking a class called Historical Geography of The Amazon. Along with studying the ecology of the region, we have also been learning about the native peoples of the area and their history before the arrival of Europeans. Many people are aware of the Mayan, Incan, and Aztec civilizations, but they usually assume that the Americas were a vast wilderness inhabited by small bands of hunter-gatherers. Because these civilizations did little to contribute to the development of the modern culture, history education has frequently overlooked them. The general public assumed that these peoples lived in harmony with nature and did little to alter their surrounding environment. Many historians and anthropologists now no longer believe this is true. Based on archeological evidence, places such as the island of Marajò, at the mouth of the Amazon River, appear to have had a population of up to 250,000 people, suggesting that the Amazon was home to many more people than previously thought. (Michael Goulding, Floods of Fortune: Ecology and Economy Along the Amazon. New York: Columbia University 1996).
Originally, anthropologists believed that, due to the Amazon basin’s poor soils (most of the nutrients in the soil are leached out with the rainfall or are absorbed right away by the thick vegetation) and inability to support widespread agriculture, no cities or large settlements of people could have existed in the Amazon. Also, since the basin lacks rocks (useful for efficiently clearing forests), and plants and animals that are easily domesticated, anthropologists and historians believed that the Amazon was sparsely populated. Charles Mann, in his book 1491, wrote about the changing views and new discoveries in the Amazon. Archeologists have unearthed large areas of soils, called terra preta or Indian soils, rich in charcoal. The charcoal in the soil holds nutrients longer than the typical soils of the Amazon floodplain thus allowing cultivation. Archeologists have also discovered thousands of pottery shards mixed into these soils, suggesting that people manipulated the soil to grow crops, such as palm trees like the acai (the fruit of the tree is rich in nutrients) and manioc (a starchy root crop). A small group of people could not have produced such a large number of pottery shards. Only a highly complex and organized society based on intensive floodplain agriculture with specialized craftsmen would have been able to build up these earthen mounds. With plenty of different fish species and a variety of tree fruits and nuts, there was more than enough food and resources for large agricultural societies to develop.

“One of the biggest patches of terra preta is on the high bluffs at the mouth of the (river) Tapajòs, near Santarem. The terra preta zone is tree miles long and half a mile wide, suggesting widespread human habitation.”

The myth that American Indians, from the Amazon to North America, did little to manipulate their environment is slowly dissolving. It may become clear that vast complex cultures thrived across the continents just as they did in Europe and Asia. It is hard to develop an accurate picture of the Amazon when artifacts don’t survive long in the moisture rich environment. Diseases brought to the new world by the Europeans decimated the native populations, so their history and cultural traditions were lost. Charles Mann’s book, as well as work done by anthropologists and archeologists, shed new light on our old ideas.

For more information there is a good NPR interview along with an Atlantic article that gives more information about the Amazon floodplain before the arrival of the Europeans.

5 comments:

  1. I found it interesting that the myth that the ancient American societies were less sophisticated and smaller has begun to be dissented. I agree that the American societies possessed more technology and a higher population than first believed.

    The NPR interview was very informative and stated that the ancient American cultures were just as advanced and populous as the European cultures in existence at the same time. I found it fascinating that the ancient Americans used fibers to make bridges, of which the Spaniards were unfamiliar. In addition, the ancient American cultures used metals for display more than structural uses.

    Your article presents an excellent argument against the idea that ancient American cultures did not change the environment around them. It is clear to see that they could have survived from the charcoal in the soil and the amounts of fruit. The pottery is excellent evidence of a technologically complex nation as was discussed in class about the characteristics of the first civilizations.

    I still believe however that the Europeans were in some way able to dominate the ancient Americans. Most likely this was possible as a result of disease, as stated in the article.

    Therefore, it is clear that more investigation should be done on these ancient cultures to find out exactly how sophisticated they were. They definitely were more technologically complex and populous than historians were first led to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Emulating these ancient technologies can also cure our societies main problems.

    Biochar allows the soil food web to build much more recalcitrant organic carbon, ( living biomass & Glomalins) in addition to the carbon in the biochar.
    .
    Biochar viewed as soil Infrastructure; The old saw;
    "Feed the Soil Not the Plants" becomes;
    "Feed, Cloth and House the Soil, utilities included !".
    Free Carbon Condominiums with carboxyl group fats in the pantry and hydroxyl alcohol in the mini bar.
    Build it and the Wee-Beasties will come.
    As one microbiologist said on the Biochar list; "Microbes like to sit down when they eat".
    By setting this table we expand husbandry to whole new orders of life.

    One aspect of Biochar systems are Cheap, clean biomass stoves that produce biochar and no respiratory disease. At scale, the health benefits are greater than ending Malaria.
    www.unccd.int/publicinfo/poznanclimatetalks/docs/Natural%20Draft%20Stove.pdf

    Endorsments:
    Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar, NASA's Dr. James Hansen
    Charles Mann ("1491") in the Sept. National Geographic
    Dr. James Lovelock; " Mankinds only Hope"
    Tony Blair, Malcomb Turnbull, Richard Branson
    Dozens of USDA-ARS Researchers

    Soil Carbon Sequestration Standards Committee. Hosted by Monsanto, this group of diverse interests has been hammering out issues of definition, validation and protocol. The past week, this group have been pressing soil sequestration's roll for climate legislation to congress.
    www.novecta.com/documents/Carbon-Standard.pdf

    Along these lines internationally, the work of the IBI fostering the application by 13 countries for UN recognition of soil carbon as a sink with biochar as a clean development mechanism will open the door for programs across the globe.
    www.biochar-international.org/biocharpolicy.html.

    Reports:
    This new Congressional Research Service report (by analyst Kelsi Bracmort) is the best short summary I have seen so far - both technical and policy oriented.
    assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40186_20090203.pdf .

    Carbon to the Soil, the only ubiquitous and economic place to put it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed the NPR, I found it very interesting that we were taught that the lands were bare, when really they were alive and full of people. It was as populated as Europe, but because of the plaque Europeans thought that because they found barren land that there was never anyone there.

    In 1491 the Indian society along the coast land had wooden walls and miles of farmland. As you went further down I found it interesting that the Indians were more technological advanced. They were compared to London and Paris.

    It was also interesting to find out that the Indians used metal to decorate and create color, yet they did not have tools.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Erich J. Knight (wherever he came from) made a viable point. It is interesting that one of the solutions to today's problem (specifically global climate change) can be solved using ancient technology. The relationship many native cultures had with their surrounding environment was one of close management and manipulation. These people had a better understanding of their surroundings and had knowledge that has been lost over successive generations. It is important to look to these ancient cultures and how they used technology, to help us answer the problems we are encountering today. Those civilizations that over exploited their environments perished or collapsed, such as Easter Island and some civilizations in the Middle East.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Anna,

    Remember, you are on the web, for anyone in the world to read what you wrote. And some will surely even comment on it.

    Cheers,
    ---add

    ReplyDelete